Nguyen Van Phuc1, Ngo Van Cam1, Nguyen Pham Doan1, Ho Si Hung1, Le Thi Thuy Hoa1, Truong Quang Cuong2, Le Van Son2, Dang Van Van3, Pham Tran Thi Van Khanh3, Le Hong En1,*
1Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam, Lam Dong Province 670000, Vietnam
2Bidoup Nui Ba National Park, Lam Dong Province 670000, Vietnam
3Dalat University, Lam Dong Province 670000, Vietnam
Abstract
Taxus wallichiana Zucc. is an endangered medicinal tree species valued for its production of paclitaxel, but its conservation is constrained by overexploitation and poor natural regeneration. This study evaluated the feasibility of propagating T. wallichiana by apical cuttings under nursery conditions as a conservation-oriented alternative to seed propagation and lateral cuttings. Two year-old donor plants subjected to apical shoot removal produced a cumulative 25.93 ± 0.84 suitable shoots per plant after 12 months, providing a reliable source of propagules. Rooting performance was significantly affected by IBA concentration, rooting substrate, and cutting length. Among the tested treatments, 1.0% IBA was the most effective concentration for root induction. The best rooting performance was obtained in a substrate containing 25% sand and 75% coir dust, with a rooting percentage of 90.00 ± 5.00%, 8.13 ± 0.12 roots per cutting, and a mean root length of 4.83 ± 0.24 cm. Apical cuttings 10–15 cm in length rooted better than 15–20 cm cuttings. For nursery growth, potting media containing 75% soil + 25% coir dust or 50% soil + 50% coir dust gave the best performance, with 100% survival and plant heights of 30.93 ± 0.66 cm and 30.33 ± 0.56 cm, respectively. After 18 months, cutting-derived plants reached 81.43 ± 2.13 cm in height and 1.15 ± 0.05 cm in basal diameter, outperforming seed-derived seedlings. These findings indicate that apical cutting is a promising propagation approach for conservation and restoration of T. wallichiana.
Keywords: apical cutting, IBA, substrate, Taxus wallichiana, topophysis
Sources: Folia Oecologica, Volume 53 (2026): Issue 2 (May 2026)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2026-0015